Jefferson v. State
895 So. 2d 1263, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 3070, 2005 WL 545199
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 9, 2005
DocketNo. 3D04-2509
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 895 So. 2d 1263 (Jefferson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Jefferson v. State, 895 So. 2d 1263, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 3070, 2005 WL 545199 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).
Opinion
Affirmed. See Cooper v. State, 817 So.2d 934 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002) (holding that a claim that a notice of intent to habitualize is not sufficiently specific must be raised in a Rule 3.850 motion).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
IMC Phosphates Co. v. Prater
895 So. 2d 1263 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
895 So. 2d 1263, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 3070, 2005 WL 545199, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jefferson-v-state-fladistctapp-2005.