Jefferson v. State

799 So. 2d 322, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 14214, 2001 WL 1188985
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 10, 2001·No. No. 3D99-3175·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

James Jefferson appeals an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. We reverse in part and remand for further proceedings solely on the claim that trial counsel was ineffective for failing to call Ms. Williams and the defendant as witnesses at trial. Under the applicable standard of review, [o]n appeal from the denial of relief, unless the record shows conclusively that the appellant is entitled to no relief, the order shall be reversed and the cause remanded for an evidentiary hearing or other appropriate relief.” Fla. R.App. P. 9.141(2).

The limited record now before us does not conclusively refute the claim of defendant-appellant on this point. We therefore remand so that the trial court may identify those parts of the record which conclusively refute the defendant’s claim, or alternatively, conduct an evidentiary hearing.

We affirm the order denying postconviction relief on the defendant’s remaining claims.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded for further proceedings consistent herewith.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jefferson v. State, 799 So. 2d 322, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 14214, 2001 WL 1188985 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

799 So. 2d 322 (Jefferson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

DeWitt v. SCHOOL BD. OF SARASOTA COUNTY
799 So. 2d 322 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)