Jefferson v. Rockett
This text of 73 F. App'x 697 (Jefferson v. Rockett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Danny R. Jefferson appeals from the dismissal of his civil-rights complaint, filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, but specifically limits his appeal to the district court’s denial of his motion for entry of default judgment against defendants Leann Tho-mason and the Probation and Parole Board. He argues that his motion for default judgment should have been granted because he properly served both of these defendants with a summons and complaint and these defendants failed to file an answer in response within 20 days of that service.
Jefferson’s motion for entry of default judgment was denied because the district court held that Jefferson had not shown that these two defendants were properly served. Jefferson has not shown that the district court’s denial of that motion constituted an abuse of discretion. See Thomas v. Kippermann, 846 F.2d 1009, 1011 (5th Cir.1988). Accordingly, the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED. All of Jefferson’s outstanding motions are DENIED.
AFFIRMED; MOTIONS DENIED.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
73 F. App'x 697, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jefferson-v-rockett-ca5-2003.