Jefferson v. Padley

100 A. 600, 29 Del. 553, 6 Boyce 553, 1917 Del. LEXIS 25
CourtSuperior Court of Delaware
DecidedJanuary 11, 1917
DocketNo. 1
StatusPublished

This text of 100 A. 600 (Jefferson v. Padley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jefferson v. Padley, 100 A. 600, 29 Del. 553, 6 Boyce 553, 1917 Del. LEXIS 25 (Del. Ct. App. 1917).

Opinion

Per Curiam:

At one time in this state, under such circumstances, it was necessary to issue the alias or pluries fi. fa. in the form of a fi. fa. for the residue. Fiddleman v. Biddle, 1 Harr. 500. However, this practice has been changed for many years and it is now sufficient if the alias or pluries writ issues in the general form of an alias or pluries fi. fa. Woolley on Del. Practice, § 1002.

As the form of the writ issued in this case follows the established practice, we are of the opinion that it should not be quashed. The court therefore refuse the motion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
100 A. 600, 29 Del. 553, 6 Boyce 553, 1917 Del. LEXIS 25, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jefferson-v-padley-delsuperct-1917.