Jefferson v. North Rockland Central School District

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Jefferson v. North Rockland Central School District

220 A.D.2d 642, 633 N.Y.S.2d 51, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10627

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 23, 1995·Published

Opinion

—In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Rock-land County (Meehan, J.), entered March 7, 1994, which granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, and (2) a judgment of the same court entered April 6, 1994, which dismissed the complaint.

Ordered that the appeal from the order is dismissed; and it is further,

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed; and it is further,

Ordered that the defendant is awarded one bill of costs.

The appeal from the intermediate order must be dismissed because the right of direct appeal terminated with the entry of the judgment in the action (see, Matter of Aho, 39 NY2d 241, 248). The issues raised on appeal from the order are brought up for review and have been considered on the appeal from the judgment (CPLR 5501 [a] [1]).

Contrary to the plaintiffs contentions, the mere fact that the land in question was not located in an area that can be characterized as wilderness, remote, or undeveloped did not deprive the landowner of the limited liability of General Obligations Law § 9-103 (see, Iannotti v Consolidated Rail Corp., 74 NY2d 39, 45).

Furthermore, there is no issue of fact as to whether the defendant acted willfully or maliciously (see, General Obligations Law § 9-103 [2] [a]; Fenton v Consolidated Edison, 165 AD2d 121, 125). Sullivan, J. P., Thompson, Copertino, Krausman and Florio, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Rock-land County (Meehan, J.), entered March 7, 1994, which granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, and (2) a judgment of the same court entered April 6, 1994, which dismissed the complaint.

Ordered that the appeal from the order is dismissed; and it is further,

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed; and it is further,

Ordered that the defendant is awarded one bill of costs.

The appeal from the intermediate order must be dismissed because the right of direct appeal terminated with the entry of the judgment in the action (see, Matter of Aho, 39 NY2d 241, 248). The issues raised on appeal from the order are brought up for review and have been considered on the appeal from the judgment (CPLR 5501 [a] [1]).

Contrary to the plaintiffs contentions, the mere fact that the land in question was not located in an area that can be characterized as wilderness, remote, or undeveloped did not deprive the landowner of the limited liability of General Obligations Law § 9-103 (see, Iannotti v Consolidated Rail Corp., 74 NY2d 39, 45).

Furthermore, there is no issue of fact as to whether the defendant acted willfully or maliciously (see, General Obligations Law § 9-103 [2] [a]; Fenton v Consolidated Edison, 165 AD2d 121, 125). Sullivan, J. P., Thompson, Copertino, Krausman and Florio, JJ., concur.

Jefferson v. North Rockland Central School District, 220 A.D.2d 642, 633 N.Y.S.2d 51, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10627 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

220 A.D.2d 642 (Jefferson v. North Rockland Central School District) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related