Jefferson v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.

Fourth Circuit

Jefferson v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.

670 F. App'x 190

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided November 18, 2016·No. No. 16-1086·Published

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Carol Jefferson appeals the district court’s orders dismissing her complaint for insufficient service of process and denying her motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Jefferson v. Nat’l R.R. Passenger Corp., No. 8:15-cv-02275-DKC, 2015 WL 6437364, 2015 WL 9311987 (D. Md. Oct. 21, 2015; Dec. 23, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Carol Jefferson appeals the district court’s orders dismissing her complaint for insufficient service of process and denying her motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Jefferson v. Nat’l R.R. Passenger Corp., No. 8:15-cv-02275-DKC, 2015 WL 6437364, 2015 WL 9311987 (D. Md. Oct. 21, 2015; Dec. 23, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Jefferson v. National Railroad Passenger Corp., 670 F. App'x 190 (4th Cir. 2016).

Pincite

670 F. App'x 190 (Jefferson v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.