Jefferson v. MEC Development, LLC

District Court, E.D. California·Decided December 4, 2019·No. 1:17-cv-01394·Unknown

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 10

11 ANTONIO JEFFERSON, et al., ) Case No.: 1:17-cv-01394 AWI JLT ) 12 Plaintiffs, ) ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK TO CLOSE ) THE ACTION 13 v. )

14 MEC DEVELOPMENT, et al., ) (Doc. 32) ) 15 Defendants. ) ) 16

17 On December 3, 2019 the parties filed a stipulation indicating the action should be dismissed 18 without prejudice. (Doc. 32) Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) allows that “the plaintiff 19 may dismiss an action without a court order by filing . . . a stipulation of dismissal signed by all parties 20 who have appeared.” Because all parties who have appeared signed the stipulation, it “automatically 21 terminate[d] the action.” Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997); Fed.R.Civ.P. 22 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). Accordingly, based upon the stipulation of the parties, the Clerk of Court is 23 DIRECTED to close this action. 24

26 Dated: December 4, 2019 /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston 27 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jefferson v. MEC Development, LLC, (E.D. Cal. 2019).

Jefferson v. MEC Development, LLC (Jefferson v. MEC Development, LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wilson v. City of San Jose
111 F.3d 688 (Ninth Circuit, 1997)