Jefferson v. DANIELE RODGERS HOTEL, LLC

241 S.W.3d 836, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1723, 2007 WL 4394459
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided December 18, 2007·No. ED 89889·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Jason Jefferson (hereinafter, “Employee”) appeals pro se from the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (hereinafter, “the Commission”), finding he left work voluntarily without good cause attributable to his work or employer and denying him unemployment compensation benefits. Employee raises one point on appeal, claiming the Commission acted in excess of its authority in that it failed to make the required findings that Employee was ineligible for benefits.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jefferson v. DANIELE RODGERS HOTEL, LLC, 241 S.W.3d 836, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1723, 2007 WL 4394459 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).

241 S.W.3d 836 (Jefferson v. DANIELE RODGERS HOTEL, LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Drummer v. State
241 S.W.3d 836 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2007)