Jefferson County v. Hard
This text of 290 U.S. 598 (Jefferson County v. Hard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The appeal herein is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question. (1) Pawhuska v. Pawhuska Oil Co., 250 U.S. 394, 397-399; Trenton v. New Jersey, 262 U.S. 182, 188, 191, 192; Chicago v. Chicago Rapid Transit Co., 284 U.S. 577, 578. (2) Quong Ham Wah Co. v. Industrial Accident Comm’n, 255 U.S. 445, 448, 449; Knights of Pythias v. Meyer, 265 U.S. 30, 32, 33; American Railway Express Co. v. Royster Guano Co., 273 U.S. 274, 280; Swiss Oil Corp. v. Shanks, 273 U.S. 392, 411, 412.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
290 U.S. 598, 54 S. Ct. 132, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jefferson-county-v-hard-scotus-1933.