Jefferson County v. Hard
290 U.S. 598, 54 S. Ct. 132
Opinion
The appeal herein is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question. (1) Pawhuska v. Pawhuska Oil Co., 250 U.S. 394, 397-399; Trenton v. New Jersey, 262 U.S. 182, 188, 191, 192; Chicago v. Chicago Rapid Transit Co., 284 U.S. 577, 578. (2) Quong Ham Wah Co. v. Industrial Accident Comm’n, 255 U.S. 445, 448, 449; Knights of Pythias v. Meyer, 265 U.S. 30, 32, 33; American Railway Express Co. v. Royster Guano Co., 273 U.S. 274, 280; Swiss Oil Corp. v. Shanks, 273 U.S. 392, 411, 412.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Jefferson County v. Hard, 290 U.S. 598, 54 S. Ct. 132 (1933).
290 U.S. 598 (Jefferson County v. Hard) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
City of Pawhuska v. Pawhuska Oil & Gas Co.
250 U.S. 394 (Supreme Court, 1919)
Quong Ham Wah Co. v. Industrial Accident Comm'n of Cal.
255 U.S. 445 (Supreme Court, 1921)
City of Trenton v. New Jersey
262 U.S. 182 (Supreme Court, 1923)
Supreme Lodge, Knights of Pythias v. Meyer
265 U.S. 30 (Supreme Court, 1924)
American Railway Express Co. v. Royster Guano Co.
273 U.S. 274 (Supreme Court, 1927)
United States v. Trenton Potteries Co.
273 U.S. 392 (Supreme Court, 1927)
Chicago v. Chicago Rapid Transit Co.
284 U.S. 577 (Supreme Court, 1931)