Jefferson County v. Acker

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Jefferson County v. Acker. Read the opinion of the Court — 61 F.3d 848
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided August 21, 1995·No. 94-6400·Published

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals,

Eleventh Circuit.

No. 94-6400.

JEFFERSON COUNTY, A political subdivision of the State of Alabama, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

William W. ACKER, Jr., Defendant-Appellee.

JEFFERSON COUNTY, A political subdivision of the State of Alabama, Plaintiff-Appellant,

U.W. CLEMON, Defendant-Appellee.

Jan. 12, 1996.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama (Nos. CV-93-M-69-5 and CV-93-M-196-5), Charles A. Moye, Jr., Judge.

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

(Opinion August 21, 1995, 11th Cir., 1995, 61 F.3d 848)

Before TJOFLAT, Chief Judge, and KRAVITCH, HATCHETT, ANDERSON, EDMONDSON, COX, BIRCH, DUBINA, BLACK, CARNES and BARKETT, Circuit Judges.*

BY THE COURT:

A member of this court in active service having requested a

poll on the suggestion for rehearing en banc and a majority of the

judges in this court in active service having voted in favor of

granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this

court en banc. The previous panel's opinion is hereby VACATED.

* Senior U.S. Circuit Judge Albert J. Henderson has elected to participate in further proceedings in this matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 46(c).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jefferson County v. Acker, (11th Cir. 1995).

Jefferson County v. Acker (Jefferson County v. Acker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related