Jefferson County Bank v. Lanius

Colorado Court of Appeals

Jefferson County Bank v. Lanius

11 Colo. App. 344

CourtColorado Court of Appeals

DecidedApril 15, 1898

DocketNo. 1368

StatusPublished

This text of 11 Colo. App. 344 (Jefferson County Bank v. Lanius) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Colorado Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jefferson County Bank v. Lanius, 11 Colo. App. 344 (Colo. Ct. App. 1898).

Pincite

Opinion

Bissell, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

As was suggested in the preceding opinion, this case was tried with the case of The Jefferson County Bank v. Hummel, ante, p. 337, by consolidation in the lower court, and the decree was rendered on precisely the same testimony. There was no difference whatever in the two cases, except as to the parties in interest, the amount of the indebtedness, and the property covered. Since we affirmed the judgment in The Bank v. Hummel the affirmance of this must of necessity follow.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bissell, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

As was suggested in the preceding opinion, this case was tried with the case of The Jefferson County Bank v. Hummel, ante, p. 337, by consolidation in the lower court, and the decree was rendered on precisely the same testimony. There was no difference whatever in the two cases, except as to the parties in interest, the amount of the indebtedness, and the property covered. Since we affirmed the judgment in The Bank v. Hummel the affirmance of this must of necessity follow.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

11 Colo. App. 344, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jefferson-county-bank-v-lanius-coloctapp-1898.