Jefferson Clinic, P.C. v. Mixon

Supreme Court of Alabama

Jefferson Clinic, P.C. v. Mixon

684 So. 2d 127, 1996 Ala. LEXIS 481

Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided September 6, 1996·No. 1950388, 1950473·Published

Opinion

HOUSTON, Justice.

The judgment entered on the jury’s verdict for Dr. David Young is affirmed. However, the trial court’s order granting a new trial on the plaintiffs claim against Jefferson Clinic, P.C., is reversed on the ground that the evidence does not sufficiently indicate that any physician/employee of the clinic breached the appropriate standard of care in treating the plaintiff. In this respect, the case is remanded for the trial court to grant the clime’s motion for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict.

1950388 — REVERSED AND REMANDED WITH INSTRUCTIONS.

1950473 — AFFIRMED.

HOOPER, C.J., and ALMON, INGRAM, and BUTTS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

HOUSTON, Justice.

The judgment entered on the jury’s verdict for Dr. David Young is affirmed. However, the trial court’s order granting a new trial on the plaintiffs claim against Jefferson Clinic, P.C., is reversed on the ground that the evidence does not sufficiently indicate that any physician/employee of the clinic breached the appropriate standard of care in treating the plaintiff. In this respect, the case is remanded for the trial court to grant the clime’s motion for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict.

1950388 — REVERSED AND REMANDED WITH INSTRUCTIONS.

1950473 — AFFIRMED.

HOOPER, C.J., and ALMON, INGRAM, and BUTTS, JJ., concur.

Jefferson Clinic, P.C. v. Mixon, 684 So. 2d 127, 1996 Ala. LEXIS 481 (Ala. 1996).

Pincite

684 So. 2d 127 (Jefferson Clinic, P.C. v. Mixon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.