Jefferson A/K/A Pierre v. State

201 So. 3d 156, 2016 WL 1696665, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 6335
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 27, 2016
Docket3D13-3077
StatusPublished

This text of 201 So. 3d 156 (Jefferson A/K/A Pierre v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jefferson A/K/A Pierre v. State, 201 So. 3d 156, 2016 WL 1696665, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 6335 (Fla. Ct. App. 2016).

Opinion

SUAREZ, C.J.

On March 11, 2015, this Court issued an opinion affirming the denial of Cedric Jefferson’s a/k/a David Pierre (“Jefferson”) motion to correct sentence and order prohibiting him from filing any further post-conviction motions. In addition, our opinion contained an order to show cause why Jefferson should not be prohibited from filing with this Court any further pro se appeals, petitions, motions or other proceedings related to the convictions and sentences imposed in circuit court case numbers F96-41741 and F97-26815. Jefferson filed his response on April 23, 2015 but failed therein to show good cause to justify further pro se filings of appeals, petitions, motions, and other pleadings with this Court.

*157 We must balance Jefferson’s pro se right of access to courts with the Court’s need to devote its finite resources to legitimate appeals, recognizing the seriousness of the sanction when the litigant is a criminal defendant. State v. Spencer, 751 So.2d 47, 48 (Fla.1999). After an order to show cause and an opportunity to respond, a court may prevent such further filings. Id.

It is hereby ordered that the Clerk of the Court of the Third District Court of Appeal shall refuse further pro se filings related to case numbers F96-41741 and F97-26815; provided, however, that filings related to case numbers F96-41741 and F97-26815 may be accepted by the Clerk if such filings have been reviewed and signed by an attorney who is a licensed member of the Florida Bar in good standing.

Any further and unauthorized pro se filings by Jefferson will subject him to sanctions, including the issuance of written findings forwarded to the Florida Department of Corrections for consideration by it for disciplinary action, pursuant to section 944.279(1) of the Florida Statutes.

Order issued.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Spencer
751 So. 2d 47 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
201 So. 3d 156, 2016 WL 1696665, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 6335, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jefferson-aka-pierre-v-state-fladistctapp-2016.