Jeffers v. Sydnam

89 N.W. 42, 129 Mich. 440, 1902 Mich. LEXIS 477
Michigan Supreme Court·Decided February 11, 1902·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Grant, J.

(after stating the facts). By the law of descent in this State at the time of William J. Knapp’s [444]*444death, the widow was endowed with a life estate in the land. 2 How. Stat. § 5772a, subd. 2. The widow could not convey, even by warranty deed, any greater interest in the land than that of which she was possessed, and there is no evidence in the record that she intended to. No expectant estate can be defeated by the act of the owner of the intermediate estate, or by any destruction thereof. 3 Comp. Laws, § 8814. The present case, in all its aspects, is ruled against the defendant by Lumley v. Haggerty, 110 Mich. 552 (68 N. W. 243, 64 Am. St. Rep. 364); Bowen v. Brogan, 119 Mich. 218 (77 N. W. 942, 75 Am. St. Rep. 387). Defendant obtained only the life interest which Mrs. Knapp had, and, as such, it was his duty to pay the taxes. Smith v. Blindbury, 66 Mich. 319 (33 N. W. 391); Jenks v. Horton, 96 Mich. 13 (55 N. W. 372).

The judgment is affirmed.

Hooker, C. J., Moore and Montgomery, JJ., concurred. Long, J., did not sit.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jeffers v. Sydnam, 89 N.W. 42, 129 Mich. 440, 1902 Mich. LEXIS 477 (Mich. 1902).

89 N.W. 42 (Jeffers v. Sydnam) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Marsheri D D Everson v. Delores J Williams
Michigan Court of Appeals, 2019
Federal Land Bank v. Newsom
166 So. 346 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1936)
Newport v. Hatton
231 P. 987 (California Supreme Court, 1924)
Lowry v. Lyle
198 N.W. 245 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1924)
Myers v. Myers
152 N.W. 934 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1915)