Jeffers v. State

429 S.E.2d 519, 263 Ga. 133, 93 Fulton County D. Rep. 1963, 1993 Ga. LEXIS 457
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedMay 24, 1993
DocketS93A0304
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 429 S.E.2d 519 (Jeffers v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jeffers v. State, 429 S.E.2d 519, 263 Ga. 133, 93 Fulton County D. Rep. 1963, 1993 Ga. LEXIS 457 (Ga. 1993).

Opinion

Hunt, Presiding Justice.

Gary Todd Jeffers shot and killed Tyra Daniels, his live-in girl friend, with a handgun, following a lengthy argument between the two. He was convicted of malice murder and sentenced to life impris[134]*134onment.1 He appeals and we affirm.

Decided May 24, 1993. Steven P. Berne, for appellant. Thomas J. Charron, District Attorney, Debra H. Bernes, Nancy I. Jordan, Assistant District Attorneys, Michael J. Bowers, Attorney General, Susan V. Boleyn, Senior Assistant Attorney General, C. A. Benjamin Woolf, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

1. After reviewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the jury’s determination, we conclude that a rational trier of fact could have found Jeffers guilty of malice murder beyond a reasonable doubt. Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U. S. 307 (99 SC 2781, 61 LE2d 560) (1979).

2. Contrary to Jeffers’ contentions, the two questions he claims he should have been permitted to ask a state’s witness on cross-examination were of marginal, if any, relevance, and the trial court did not abuse its discretion in sustaining the state’s objections to those questions. O’Neal v. State, 254 Ga. 1, 3 (3) (325 SE2d 759) (1985); White v. State, 253 Ga. 106, 110 (4) (317 SE2d 196) (1984).

3. Jeffers raises a claim of ineffectiveness of trial counsel for the first time in this appeal. Although appellate counsel did not file Jeffers’ motion for new trial, appellate counsel obtained a continuance of a hearing on that motion, failed to file an amended motion raising the issue of ineffectiveness of trial counsel, and failed to raise that issue at the hearing on the motion for new trial. Accordingly, Jeffers’ claim of ineffectiveness of trial counsel is procedurally barred. Owens v. State, 263 Ga. 99 (428 SE2d 793) (1993).

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Woodmen of the World, Unit No. 3 v. Jordan
499 S.E.2d 900 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1998)
Height v. State
472 S.E.2d 485 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
429 S.E.2d 519, 263 Ga. 133, 93 Fulton County D. Rep. 1963, 1993 Ga. LEXIS 457, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jeffers-v-state-ga-1993.