Jeffers v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

United States Court of Federal Claims·Decided September 18, 2018·No. 17-596·Unpublished

Opinion

In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 17-596V Filed: August 24, 2018

* * * * * * * * * * * * * OLIVIA JEFFERS, as Natural * Guardian and Legal Representative * of her Minor Son, X.J. * UNPUBLISHED * Petitioner, * Decision on Joint Stipulation; * Transverse Myelitis; v. * Influenza (“Flu”) Vaccine * SECRETARY OF HEALTH * AND HUMAN SERVICES, * * Respondent. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Nancy Myers Esq., Ward Black Law, Greensboro, NC, for petitioner. Lara Englund, Esq., US Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

DECISION ON JOINT STIPULATION1

Roth, Special Master:

On May 3, 2017, Petitioner [“Ms. Jeffers or “petitioner”] filed a petition on behalf of her minor son, X.J., for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program.2 Petitioner alleges that he developed transverse myelitis after receiving an influenza (“flu”) vaccine

1 Although this Decision has been formally designated “unpublished,” it will nevertheless be posted on the Court of Federal Claims’s website, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107- 347, 116 Stat. 2899, 2913 (codified as amended at 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2006)). This means the Decision will be available to anyone with access to the internet. However, the parties may object to the Decision’s inclusion of certain kinds of confidential information. Specifically, under Vaccine Rule 18(b), each party has fourteen days within which to request redaction “of any information furnished by that party: (1) that is a trade secret or commercial or financial in substance and is privileged or confidential; or (2) that includes medical files or similar files, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of privacy.” Vaccine Rule 18(b). Otherwise, the whole Decision will be available to the public. Id. 2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2012).

1 on November 13, 3015. Stipulation, filed August 16, 2018, at ¶¶ 1-4. Respondent denies that any of the aforementioned immunizations caused petitioner’s injury. Stipulation at ¶ 6.

Nevertheless, the parties have agreed to settle the case. On August 16, 2018, the parties filed a joint stipulation agreeing to settle this case and describing the settlement terms.

Respondent agrees to issue the following payments:

a. A lump sum of $63,497.39, which represents a lien for services rendered in the form of a check payable jointly to petitioner, Olivia Jeffers, and

Optum Subrogation Services File #SN13439094 75 Remittance Drive Suite 6019 Chicago, IL 60675-6019

b. A lump sum of $500.00, in the form of a check payable to petitioner for past unreimbursed expenses; and

c. An amount sufficient to purchase the annuity contract described in paragraph 10 of the Stipulation, paid to the life insurance company from which the annuity will be purchased (the “Life Insurance Company”).

This amount represents compensation for all damages that would be available under § 300aa-15(a).

I adopt the parties’ stipulation attached hereto, and award compensation in the amount and on the terms set forth therein. The clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this decision.3

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/ Mindy Michaels Roth Mindy Michaels Roth Special Master

3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by each party filing a notice renouncing the right to seek review. 2 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

OLIVIA JEFFERS, as Natural Guardian and ) Legal Representative of her Minor Son, X.J., ) ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) No. 17-596V ) Special Master Mindy Michaels Roth SECRETARY OF ) HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, ) ) Respondent. ) )

STIPULATION

The parties hereby stipulate to the following matters:

1. On behalf of her son, X.J., petitioner filed a petition for vaccine compensation under

the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10 to 34 (the “Vaccine

Program”). The petition seeks compensation for injuries allegedly related to X.J.’s receipt of the

influenza (“flu”) vaccine, which vaccine is contained in the Vaccine Injury Table (the “Table”),

42 C.F.R. § 100.3 (a).

2. X.J. received his immunization on or about November 13, 2015.

3. The vaccine was administered within the United States.

4. Petitioner alleges that the vaccine caused X.J. to suffer from transverse myelitis, and

that X.J. experienced residual effects of this injury for more than six months.

5. Petitioner represents that there has been no prior award or settlement of a civil action

for damages on behalf of X.J. as a result of his condition.

6. Respondent denies that the vaccine caused X.J. to suffer from transverse myelitis or

any other injury or his current condition. 7. Maintaining their above-stated positions, the parties nevertheless now agree that the

issues between them shall be settled and that a decision should be entered awarding the

compensation described in paragraph 8 of this Stipulation.

8. As soon as practicable after an entry of judgment reflecting a decision consistent with

the terms of this Stipulation, and after petitioner has filed an election to receive compensation

pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-21(a)(1), the Secretary of Health and Human Services will issue

the following vaccine compensation payments for all damages that would be available under 42

U.S.C. §300aa-15(a):

a. A lump sum of $63,497.39, which amount represents reimbursement of a lien for services rendered on behalf of X.J., in the form of a check payable jointly to petitioner and

Optum Subrogation Services File # SN13439094 75 Remittance Drive Suite 6019 Chicago, IL 60675-6019

Petitioner agrees to endorse this check to Optum Subrogation Services.

b. A lump sum of $500.00, in the form of a check payable to petitioner for past unreimbursed expenses; and

c. An amount sufficient to purchase the annuity contract described in paragraph 10 below, paid to the life insurance company from which the annuity will be purchased (the “Life Insurance Company”).

9. The Life Insurance Company must have a minimum of $250,000,000.00 capital and

surplus, exclusive of any mandatory security valuation reserve. The Life Insurance Company

must have one of the following ratings from two of the following rating organizations:

a. A.M. Best Company: A++, A+, A+g, A+p, A+r, or A+s;

b. Moody’s Investor Service Claims Paying Rating: Aa3, Aa2, Aa1, or Aaa;

2 c. Standard and Poor’s Corporation Insurer Claims-Paying Ability Rating: AA-, AA, AA+, or AAA;

d. Fitch Credit Rating Company, Insurance Company Claims Paying Ability Rating: AA-, AA, AA+, or AAA.

10. The Secretary of Health and Human Services agrees to purchase an annuity contract

from the Life Insurance Company for the benefit of X.J., pursuant to which the which the Life

Insurance Company will agree to make four lump sum payments to X.J. for all remaining

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jeffers v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, (uscfc 2018).

Jeffers v. Secretary of Health and Human Services (Jeffers v. Secretary of Health and Human Services) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 300aa
42 U.S.C. § 300aa
§ 300aa-
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-
§ 300aa-10
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-10
§ 300aa-15
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a)
§ 300aa-21
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-21(a)(1)
Purposes
44 U.S.C. § 3501
§ 300a
42 U.S.C. § 300a