Jefferies v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Jefferies v. State

249 So. 2d 44, 1970 Fla. App. LEXIS 6565

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJuly 21, 1970

DocketNo. N-70

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 249 So. 2d 44 (Jefferies v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jefferies v. State, 249 So. 2d 44, 1970 Fla. App. LEXIS 6565 (Fla. Ct. App. 1970).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant seeks reversal of a judgment of guilt and sentence entered pursuant to his plea of guilty to the charge of attempted breaking and entering with intent to commit a misdemeanor. The sentence imposed is two years, less time served awaiting trial.

Two errors are assigned; viz, sentence is excessive and the guilty plea is invalid as being the result of promises extended to him. We find both of these assignments to be totally without merit. The sentence is less than the maximum provided by law. The remaining assignment which contends that the guilty plea is invalid is equally unavailing. See this court’s opinion in Ward v. State, 236 So.2d 187, filed June 11, 1970. A review of the transcript of the proceedings at the time the guilty plea was tendered makes it abundantly clear that appellant’s plea was knowingly, advisedly and freely made.

Affirmed.

CARROLL, DONALD K., Acting C. J., and WIGGINTON and SPECTOR, JJ„ concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant seeks reversal of a judgment of guilt and sentence entered pursuant to his plea of guilty to the charge of attempted breaking and entering with intent to commit a misdemeanor. The sentence imposed is two years, less time served awaiting trial.

Two errors are assigned; viz, sentence is excessive and the guilty plea is invalid as being the result of promises extended to him. We find both of these assignments to be totally without merit. The sentence is less than the maximum provided by law. The remaining assignment which contends that the guilty plea is invalid is equally unavailing. See this court’s opinion in Ward v. State, 236 So.2d 187, filed June 11, 1970. A review of the transcript of the proceedings at the time the guilty plea was tendered makes it abundantly clear that appellant’s plea was knowingly, advisedly and freely made.

Affirmed.

CARROLL, DONALD K., Acting C. J., and WIGGINTON and SPECTOR, JJ„ concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

249 So. 2d 44, 1970 Fla. App. LEXIS 6565, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jefferies-v-state-fladistctapp-1970.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack