Jeffcoat v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Jeffcoat v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co.

96 S.E. 616, 111 S.C. 19, 1918 S.C. LEXIS 101

CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina

DecidedJune 24, 1918

Docket9986

StatusPublished

This text of 96 S.E. 616 (Jeffcoat v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jeffcoat v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co., 96 S.E. 616, 111 S.C. 19, 1918 S.C. LEXIS 101 (S.C. 1918).

Pincite

Opinion

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Watts.

1 This is an appeal from the County Court of Richland county. The County Court sustained the magistrate in granting a nonsuit in favor of defendant. Exceptions 1, 2,J> and 4 complain of error in so doing. The exceptions must be overruled.

The evidence shows that Lorick Bros, directed the shipment. It was their mistake that the shipment went from Savannah, Ga., to Woodruff, S. C., over the defendant road instead of Woodford, S. C. The liability of the Atlantic Coast Line Railway Company as initial carrier ended with the delivery of the goods at Woodruff, S. C., and the correction by Lorick Bros, of their mistake in having the goods reshipped from Woodruff to Woodford was an entire and distinct transaction. The liability of defendant as initial carrier of an interstate shipment ceased when it delivered the goods at Woodruff. That was their contract as directed by Lorick Bros., and they carried it out.

2 Exception 5 is overruled, as defendant is entitled to tax per diem and mileage both.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Watts.

1 This is an appeal from the County Court of Richland county. The County Court sustained the magistrate in granting a nonsuit in favor of defendant. Exceptions 1, 2,J> and 4 complain of error in so doing. The exceptions must be overruled.

The evidence shows that Lorick Bros, directed the shipment. It was their mistake that the shipment went from Savannah, Ga., to Woodruff, S. C., over the defendant road instead of Woodford, S. C. The liability of the Atlantic Coast Line Railway Company as initial carrier ended with the delivery of the goods at Woodruff, S. C., and the correction by Lorick Bros, of their mistake in having the goods reshipped from Woodruff to Woodford was an entire and distinct transaction. The liability of defendant as initial carrier of an interstate shipment ceased when it delivered the goods at Woodruff. That was their contract as directed by Lorick Bros., and they carried it out.

2 Exception 5 is overruled, as defendant is entitled to tax per diem and mileage both.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

96 S.E. 616, 111 S.C. 19, 1918 S.C. LEXIS 101, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jeffcoat-v-atlantic-coast-line-r-co-sc-1918.