Jeff D. v. Cecil D. Andrus

Ninth Circuit

Jeff D. v. Cecil D. Andrus

861 F.2d 591, 1988 WL 121181

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedNovember 16, 1988

Docket87-3586, 87-4377

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 861 F.2d 591 (Jeff D. v. Cecil D. Andrus) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jeff D. v. Cecil D. Andrus, 861 F.2d 591, 1988 WL 121181 (9th Cir. 1988).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

As the district court agreed in its December 31, 1986, Memorandum Decision that “all these minors should receive treatment” and, as the district court found in its Memorandum decision of November 18, 1987, that there are undisputed members of the class, we order that appeal No. 87-4377 be remanded to the district court for a compliance hearing forthwith as to the undisputed members of the class.

This panel reserves jurisdiction over all future matters arising out of this case appealed from the district court.

The district court has jurisdiction over the compliance hearing as to the undisputed members of the class pending the decision and opinion in appeal No. 87-3586. The district court also has jurisdiction over this matter pursuant to paragraph 24 of the Stipulation Settling Mental Health Claims as the claims for relief have not been adequately addressed nor has any compliance hearing been held as to any members of the class.

No petition for rehearing will be entertained and mandate shall issue forthwith in appeal No. 87-4377. See Fed.R.App.P. 2.

With regard to appeal No. 87-3586, a decision and opinion will follow regarding the disputed members of the class.

REMANDED IN PART, RETAINED IN PART.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI