Jebousek v. Jebousek

Oregon Supreme Court

Jebousek v. Jebousek

451 P.2d 865, 252 Or. 628, 1969 Ore. LEXIS 564

DecidedMarch 19, 1969

StatusPublished

This text of 451 P.2d 865 (Jebousek v. Jebousek) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oregon Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jebousek v. Jebousek, 451 P.2d 865, 252 Or. 628, 1969 Ore. LEXIS 564 (Or. 1969).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Defendant mother moved for a change of custody to her of the parties’ daughter, age 7. The plaintiff father requested that the pre-existing order be modified to give him physical custody of the child. After hearing, the court awarded plaintiff custody, and defendant has appealed.

The divorce occurred in 1962, and the defendant was awarded the child’s custody. In 1964 custody was taken by the court, for cause, from the defendant and awarded to plaintiff on condition the child reside with plaintiff’s parents. Now each party has remarried and each seeks custody. The trial judge has heard all of the evidence, has observed the parties, and has resolved the factual issues in favor of plaintiff. The judge’s findings fall fairly within what might be expected from the evidence, and his conclusions appear to be in the best interests of the child. We find no reason to disturb the challenged order.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Defendant mother moved for a change of custody to her of the parties’ daughter, age 7. The plaintiff father requested that the pre-existing order be modified to give him physical custody of the child. After hearing, the court awarded plaintiff custody, and defendant has appealed.

The divorce occurred in 1962, and the defendant was awarded the child’s custody. In 1964 custody was taken by the court, for cause, from the defendant and awarded to plaintiff on condition the child reside with plaintiff’s parents. Now each party has remarried and each seeks custody. The trial judge has heard all of the evidence, has observed the parties, and has resolved the factual issues in favor of plaintiff. The judge’s findings fall fairly within what might be expected from the evidence, and his conclusions appear to be in the best interests of the child. We find no reason to disturb the challenged order.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

451 P.2d 865, 252 Or. 628, 1969 Ore. LEXIS 564, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jebousek-v-jebousek-or-1969.