Jebaltosky v. Birns

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Jebaltosky v. Birns

248 A.D. 558

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 15, 1936·Published

Opinion

Action for alleged breach of contract. Appeal by permission of this court from a determination of the Appellate Term of the Supreme Court, which reversed a judgment, in favor of the plaintiff, of the Municipal Court, Borough of Manhattan, Fifth District, and dismissed the complaint on the merits. Determination unanimously affirmed, with costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present ■—■ Martin, P. J., McAvoy, O’Malley, Untermyer and Cohn, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Action for alleged breach of contract. Appeal by permission of this court from a determination of the Appellate Term of the Supreme Court, which reversed a judgment, in favor of the plaintiff, of the Municipal Court, Borough of Manhattan, Fifth District, and dismissed the complaint on the merits. Determination unanimously affirmed, with costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present ■—■ Martin, P. J., McAvoy, O’Malley, Untermyer and Cohn, JJ.

Jebaltosky v. Birns, 248 A.D. 558 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).

Pincite

248 A.D. 558 (Jebaltosky v. Birns) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.