Jeanty v. New York State Department of Correctional Services

36 A.D.3d 811, 828 N.Y.S.2d 499
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 23, 2007
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 36 A.D.3d 811 (Jeanty v. New York State Department of Correctional Services) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jeanty v. New York State Department of Correctional Services, 36 A.D.3d 811, 828 N.Y.S.2d 499 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2007).

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to Executive Law § 298 to review a [812]*812determination of the New York State Division of Human Rights, dated March 30, 2005, which, after a hearing, found that the New York State Department of Correctional Services and the Green Haven Correctional Facility had not unlawfully discriminated against the petitioner on the bases of race and national origin, the petitioner appeals from an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Brands, J.), dated December 1, 2005, which granted that branch of the respondents’ motion which was to dismiss the petition for failure to join a necessary party and, in effect, denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the order and judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court correctly granted that branch of the respondents’ motion which was to dismiss the petition for failure to join a necessary party. The petitioner failed to join as a party respondent the New York State Division of Human Rights, which issued the determination challenged herein (see CPLR 1001 [a]; Executive Law § 298; 22 NYCRR 202.57 [a]; Matter of Boston Culinary Group, Inc. v New York State Olympic Regional Dev. Auth., 18 AD3d 1103 [2005]; Matter of Lodge v D’Aliso, 2 AD3d 525 [2003]; Matter of Ogbunugafor v New York State Educ. Dept., 279 AD2d 738, 739-740 [2001]).

The petitioner’s remaining contentions are without merit. Krausman, J.P, Florio, Lunn and Covello, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of Hackett v. New York State Div. of Human Rights
2021 NY Slip Op 01678 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2021)
Matter of Pierre v. F.J.C. Sec. Servs., Inc.
2019 NY Slip Op 4174 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2019)
Matter of Wahab v. Maple Crest Garden Apts.
2019 NY Slip Op 3058 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2019)
Rumman v. Reade
64 A.D.3d 715 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
Okoumou v. Community Agency for Senior Citizens, Inc.
17 Misc. 3d 827 (New York Supreme Court, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
36 A.D.3d 811, 828 N.Y.S.2d 499, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jeanty-v-new-york-state-department-of-correctional-services-nyappdiv-2007.