Jeanty v. Long Island Rail Road

292 A.D.2d 346, 738 N.Y.S.2d 614, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2203

This text of 292 A.D.2d 346 (Jeanty v. Long Island Rail Road) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jeanty v. Long Island Rail Road, 292 A.D.2d 346, 738 N.Y.S.2d 614, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2203 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Doyle, J.), dated May 2, 2001, which granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

After the defendants established their prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact. Therefore, the Supreme Court correctly granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment (see, Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557). Altman, J.P., Adams, Townes and Crane, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Zuckerman v. City of New York
404 N.E.2d 718 (New York Court of Appeals, 1980)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
292 A.D.2d 346, 738 N.Y.S.2d 614, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2203, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jeanty-v-long-island-rail-road-nyappdiv-2002.