Jeantilus v. State

789 So. 2d 409, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 7860, 2001 WL 609495
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Jeantilus v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 853 So. 2d 1099
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 6, 2001·No. No. 4D01-635·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed, without prejudice to appellant filing a motion that includes the oath required by Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850(c) within the time remaining under rule 3.850(b).

DELL, GUNTHER and FARMER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jeantilus v. State, 789 So. 2d 409, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 7860, 2001 WL 609495 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

789 So. 2d 409 (Jeantilus v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.