Jeanne H. Berson v. Government Employees Insurance Company, Defendants-Third-Party v. Royal Globe Insurance Co. (Globe Indemnity Company), Third-Party
This text of 478 F.2d 337 (Jeanne H. Berson v. Government Employees Insurance Company, Defendants-Third-Party v. Royal Globe Insurance Co. (Globe Indemnity Company), Third-Party) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The present case is an action for contribution brought by Government Employees Insurance Company (GEICO) against Royal Globe Insurance Company.
The suit arose from vehicular collision in New Orleans in which GEICO’s insured, a Mrs. Keenan, struck a vehicle driven by a Mr. Lloyd Walker. The Walker automobile was insured by Royal Globe.
On the day of trial GEICO settled the personal injury claims arising from the accident. The case proceeded to trial on GEICO’s third party complaint for contribution.
The jury found both drivers guilty of negligence which proximately caused the subject accident. The trial judge rendered judgment enforcing contribution.
*338 Royal Globe urges three grounds for reversal. It is first contended that the trial court erred in not directing a verdict in its favor, and secondly in failing to enter judgment notwithstanding the verdict in its behalf. Specifically, Royal Globe alleges that there was no evidence to indicate that its insured, Mr. Walker, was guilty of any negligence and, therefore, the question should not have been submitted to the jury.
Guided by the standard of Boeing v. Shipman, 411 F.2d 365 (5th Cir., 1969), the trial court properly denied the motions. A substantial issue regarding Walker’s negligence had been raised by the evidence and was properly submitted to and decided by the jury.
Appellants’ remaining contentions relate to alleged errors in the court’s instructions to the jury. After careful consideration, we find appellants’ claims to be without merit.
The judgment of the district court is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
478 F.2d 337, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jeanne-h-berson-v-government-employees-insurance-company-ca3-1973.