Jeanne E. Charles v. H & R Block Bank

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Jeanne E. Charles v. H & R Block Bank

149 So. 3d 112, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 14006, 2014 WL 4426469

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedSeptember 10, 2014

Docket4D13-2895

StatusPublished

This text of 149 So. 3d 112 (Jeanne E. Charles v. H & R Block Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jeanne E. Charles v. H & R Block Bank, 149 So. 3d 112, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 14006, 2014 WL 4426469 (Fla. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this mortgage foreclosure case, we accept appellee’s concession that the trial court erred in granting appellee final summary judgment because appellee did not properly serve pleadings, including an amended complaint, motion for summary judgment and hearing notice, on appellant at the designated e-mail address. Accord *113 ingly, we reverse this case and remand it to the trial court for further proceedings.

Reversed and Remanded.

GROSS, TAYLOR and MAY, JJ„ concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

In this mortgage foreclosure case, we accept appellee’s concession that the trial court erred in granting appellee final summary judgment because appellee did not properly serve pleadings, including an amended complaint, motion for summary judgment and hearing notice, on appellant at the designated e-mail address. Accord *113 ingly, we reverse this case and remand it to the trial court for further proceedings.

Reversed and Remanded.

GROSS, TAYLOR and MAY, JJ„ concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

149 So. 3d 112, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 14006, 2014 WL 4426469, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jeanne-e-charles-v-h-r-block-bank-fladistctapp-2014.