Jeanne B. Tomberlin, Drew Tomberlin v. United States

23 F.3d 369, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 15472, 1994 WL 242310
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
DecidedJune 22, 1994
Docket93-9098
StatusPublished

This text of 23 F.3d 369 (Jeanne B. Tomberlin, Drew Tomberlin v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jeanne B. Tomberlin, Drew Tomberlin v. United States, 23 F.3d 369, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 15472, 1994 WL 242310 (11th Cir. 1994).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

We are advised in this appeal by our decision in Brown v. Nichols, 8 F.3d 770 (11th Cir.1993), which was released after the district court’s decision in this case. The reasoning in Brown, a diversity case, also fits this Federal Tort Claim’s Act case. For that reason, the district court’s judgment dismissing the action is reversed, and this ease is remanded with instructions to permit the appellants to amend their complaint to attach the affidavit of Dr. William Hayes that they had proffered before judgment was entered.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
23 F.3d 369, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 15472, 1994 WL 242310, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jeanne-b-tomberlin-drew-tomberlin-v-united-states-ca11-1994.