Jeanes Hospital v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

831 A.2d 1159
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided September 16, 2003·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 16th day of September, 2003, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is hereby GRANTED LIMITED to the issue of whether filing a review petition is an appropriate procedure by which to seek amendment of a Notice of Compensation Payable, even if filed more than three years from the date of the workplace injury, in order to add to the description of the covered injury(ies) such consequential medical and psychiatric conditions which are alleged and found to have resulted from the workplace incident or injury identified in the Notice of Compensation Payable, but were not in existence at the time the Notice of Compensation Payable was executed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jeanes Hospital v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board, 831 A.2d 1159 (Pa. 2003).

831 A.2d 1159 (Jeanes Hospital v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Temple Univ. Hosp. v. WCAB (SINNOTT)
866 A.2d 489 (Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 2005)
Temple University Hospital v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board
866 A.2d 489 (Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 2005)
Zuvich v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board
854 A.2d 702 (Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 2004)
Villanova University v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board
840 A.2d 1074 (Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 2004)