Jean v. State

77 So. 3d 845, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 357, 2012 WL 104494
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Jean v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 11744
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 13, 2012·No. No. 2D11-2813·Published

Opinion

LaROSE, Judge.

Evins Jean appeals the summary denial of his motion for postconviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. The postconviction court denied the motion as untimely. We affirm. See Barrios-Cruz v. State, 63 So.3d 868 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011). As in Barrios-Cruz, 63 So.3d at 870, we hold that Padilla v. Kentucky, — U.S. -, 130 S.Ct. 1473, 176 L.Ed.2d 284 (2010), does not apply retroactively in postconviction proceedings and we certify to the Florida Supreme Court the following question of great public importance pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.030(a)(2)(A)(v):

SHOULD THE RULING IN Padilla v. Kentucky, — U.S. -, 130 S.Ct. 1473, 176 L.Ed.2d 284 (2010), BE APPLIED RETROACTIVELY IN POSTCONVICTION PROCEEDINGS?

Affirmed.

WHATLEY and DAVIS, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jean v. State, 77 So. 3d 845, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 357, 2012 WL 104494 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).

77 So. 3d 845 (Jean v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Padilla v. Kentucky
559 U.S. 356 (Supreme Court, 2010)
Barrios-Cruz v. State
63 So. 3d 868 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)