Jean v. State

786 So. 2d 1259, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 8086, 2001 WL 667814
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJune 15, 2001
DocketNo. 5D01-1275
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 786 So. 2d 1259 (Jean v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jean v. State, 786 So. 2d 1259, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 8086, 2001 WL 667814 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

Opinion

PALMER, J.

David Charles St. Jean appeals the summary denial of his rule 3.800(a) motion to correct illegal sentence. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.800(a). St. Jean claims that when he was sentenced in 1992, the trial court improperly imposed a habitual offender sentence by relying on prior convictions in five cases where the date of conviction for each prior offense was July 11, 1991 because the prior convictions were not sequential. However, when St. Jean was sentenced in 1992 the habitual offender statute did not require that prior felony convictions be sequential. See State v. Barnes, 595 So.2d 22 (Fla.1992). Accordingly, the trial court properly denied St. Jean’s motion.

AFFIRMED.

COBB and GRIFFIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Battle v. State
814 So. 2d 510 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
786 So. 2d 1259, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 8086, 2001 WL 667814, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jean-v-state-fladistctapp-2001.