Jean v. Michael M. Molaei, M.D., P.C.

57 A.D.3d 620, 868 N.Y.2d 549
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 9, 2008·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Upon review of a determination rendered after a nonjury trial, this Court’s authority “is as broad as that of the trial court,” and this Court may “render the judgment it finds warranted by the facts, taking into account in a close case the fact that the trial judge had the advantage of seeing the witnesses” (Northern Westchester Professional Park Assoc. v Town of Bedford, 60 NY2d 492, 499 [1983] [citation and internal quotation marks omitted]; see Betsy Meyer Assoc., Inc. v Lorber, 42 AD3d 509 [2007]; Nelson v McKay, 41 AD3d 802 [2007]). We discern no basis to disturb the Supreme Court’s determination. Mastro, J.E, Rivera, Fisher and Eng, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jean v. Michael M. Molaei, M.D., P.C., 57 A.D.3d 620, 868 N.Y.2d 549 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2008).

57 A.D.3d 620 (Jean v. Michael M. Molaei, M.D., P.C.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Inc. Village of Valley Stream v. Hempstead Video, Inc.
60 A.D.3d 994 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)