Jean v. Michael M. Molaei, M.D., P.C.

57 A.D.3d 620, 868 N.Y.2d 549
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 9, 2008
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 57 A.D.3d 620 (Jean v. Michael M. Molaei, M.D., P.C.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jean v. Michael M. Molaei, M.D., P.C., 57 A.D.3d 620, 868 N.Y.2d 549 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2008).

Opinion

Upon review of a determination rendered after a nonjury trial, this Court’s authority “is as broad as that of the trial court,” and this Court may “render the judgment it finds warranted by the facts, taking into account in a close case the fact that the trial judge had the advantage of seeing the witnesses” (Northern Westchester Professional Park Assoc. v Town of Bedford, 60 NY2d 492, 499 [1983] [citation and internal quotation marks omitted]; see Betsy Meyer Assoc., Inc. v Lorber, 42 AD3d 509 [2007]; Nelson v McKay, 41 AD3d 802 [2007]). We discern no basis to disturb the Supreme Court’s determination. Mastro, J.E, Rivera, Fisher and Eng, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Inc. Village of Valley Stream v. Hempstead Video, Inc.
60 A.D.3d 994 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
57 A.D.3d 620, 868 N.Y.2d 549, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jean-v-michael-m-molaei-md-pc-nyappdiv-2008.