Jean v. Johns
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
RICHEKAD JEAN, Petitioner,
v. Case No. 1:21-cv-431
TRACY JOHNS, HONORABLE PAUL L. MALONEY Respondent. ____________________________/
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
This is a habeas corpus petition filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. The matter was referred to the Magistrate Judge, who issued a Report and Recommendation on September 13, 2021, recommending that this Court deny the petition. The Report and Recommendation was duly served on the parties. No objections have been filed, see 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and the Court issues this Order. The Court will also issue a Judgment in this § 2241 proceeding. See Gillis v. United States, 729 F.3d 641, 643 (6th Cir. 2013) (requiring a separate judgment in habeas proceedings). Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (ECF No. 17) is APPROVED and ADOPTED as the Opinion of the Court and the petition for habeas corpus relief (ECF No. 1) is DENIED for the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation. A Judgment will be entered consistent with this Order.
Dated: October 12, 2021 /s/ Paul L. Maloney Paul L. Maloney United States District Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Jean v. Johns (Jean v. Johns) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.