JEAN R. LOLLI v. SUNTRUST BANK

275 So. 3d 726
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJune 12, 2019
Docket17-2997
StatusPublished

This text of 275 So. 3d 726 (JEAN R. LOLLI v. SUNTRUST BANK) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
JEAN R. LOLLI v. SUNTRUST BANK, 275 So. 3d 726 (Fla. Ct. App. 2019).

Opinion

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

JEAN R. LOLLI a/k/a JEAN LOLLI, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D17-2997 ) SUNTRUST BANK, ) ) Appellee. ) )

Opinion filed June 12, 2019.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Sarasota County; Thomas M. Gallen, Senior Judge.

H. Daniel McKillop of McKillop Law Firm, Sarasota, for Appellant.

Philip D. Storey, Daniel R. Blundy, and Amanda Renee Murphy of Alvarez, Winthrop, Thompson & Storey, P.A., Orlando, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Jean Lolli appeals from a final judgment of foreclosure in favor of SunTrust

Bank. We affirm without comment in all but one respect. In its computation of the

amount due under the promissory note and mortgage, the final judgment includes items

for title search expenses, attorney's fees, court costs, service of summons, and property registration. SunTrust offered no evidence with respect to any of these items at trial,

and it properly concedes that the evidence was insufficient to support their inclusion in

the judgment. Accordingly, we reverse the final judgment to that limited extent and

remand with instructions to the trial court to enter an amended final judgment that

excludes those items. See Tracey v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., 264 So. 3d 1152, 1162-

66 (Fla. 2d DCA 2019) (reconciling this court's remand instructions in foreclosure cases

and holding that absent exceptional circumstances, a party that fails to prove its case at

trial does not get a second bite at the apple on remand).

Affirmed in part; reversed in part; remanded with instructions.

SALARIO, J., and CASE, JAMES R., ASSOCIATE SENIOR JUDGE, Concur. ATKINSON, J., Concurs in result only.

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

MARLYN TRACEY v. WELLS FARGO BANK N. A.
264 So. 3d 1152 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2019)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
275 So. 3d 726, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jean-r-lolli-v-suntrust-bank-fladistctapp-2019.