JEAN DESROSES v. State
This text of JEAN DESROSES v. State (JEAN DESROSES v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed February 3, 2021. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
________________
No. 3D20-1763 Lower Tribunal No. 94-20024A ________________
Jean Desroses, Appellant,
vs.
The State of Florida, Appellee.
An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Lourdes Simon, Judge.
Jean Desroses, in proper person.
Ashley Moody, Attorney General, for appellee.
Before EMAS, C.J., and SCALES and LOBREE, JJ.
PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Brooks v. State, 969 So. 2d 238, 243 (Fla. 2007)
(holding that the “could have been imposed” test is the proper one to apply
to a rule 3.800(a) motion to correct an illegal sentence resulting from a
scoresheet error, and that “if the trial court could have imposed the same
sentence using a corrected scoresheet, any error was harmless”); Masis v.
State, 245 So. 3d 913 (Fla. 3d DCA 2018).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
JEAN DESROSES v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jean-desroses-v-state-fladistctapp-2021.