J.E. Saenz & Associates, Inc. v. Aaron Munoz and Munoz Enterprises, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided May 12, 2011·No. 13-10-00666-CV·Published

Opinion

NUMBER 13-11-00048-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG ____________________________________________________________

MUHAMMAD BASHIR, Appellant,

v.

ZARGHOONA ZAHID, Appellee. ____________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 317th District Court of Jefferson County, Texas. ____________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Benavides Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, Muhammad Bashir, perfected an appeal from a final decree of divorce.

On February 23, 2011, the Clerk of this Court notified appellant that the clerk's record in

the above cause was originally due on January 19, 2011, and that the deputy district

clerk, Maritza Downs, had notified this Court that appellant failed to make arrangements

for payment of the clerk's record. The Clerk of this Court notified appellant of this defect so that steps could be taken to correct the defect, if it could be done. See TEX. R. APP. P.

37.3, 42.3(b),(c). Appellant was advised that, if the defect was not corrected within ten

days from the date of receipt of this notice, the appeal would be dismissed for want of

prosecution.

Appellant has failed to respond to this Court=s notice. Accordingly, the appeal is

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b), (c).

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the 12th day of May, 2011.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

J.E. Saenz & Associates, Inc. v. Aaron Munoz and Munoz Enterprises, Inc., (Tex. Ct. App. 2011).

J.E. Saenz & Associates, Inc. v. Aaron Munoz and Munoz Enterprises, Inc. (J.E. Saenz & Associates, Inc. v. Aaron Munoz and Munoz Enterprises, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.