J.E. Boyd General Contractor, Inc. v. Prestidge Smith Razloznik, Inc.

179 S.W.3d 730, 2005 Tex. App. LEXIS 9463, 2005 WL 3019013
CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedNovember 10, 2005
Docket08-05-00327-CV
StatusPublished

This text of 179 S.W.3d 730 (J.E. Boyd General Contractor, Inc. v. Prestidge Smith Razloznik, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
J.E. Boyd General Contractor, Inc. v. Prestidge Smith Razloznik, Inc., 179 S.W.3d 730, 2005 Tex. App. LEXIS 9463, 2005 WL 3019013 (Tex. Ct. App. 2005).

Opinion

OPINION

RICHARD BARAJAS, Chief Justice.

Pending before the Court is the Appellant’s unopposed motion to dismiss this appeal. Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.1(a)(1) states:

(a) On Motion or By Agreement. The appellate court may dispose of an appeal as follows:
(1) On Motion of Appellant. In accordance with a motion of appellant, the court may dismiss the appeal or affirm the appealed judgment or order unless disposition would prevent a party from seeking relief to which it would otherwise be entitled.

Tex.R.App. P. 42.1(a)(1).

Appellant has complied with the requirements of Rule 42.1(a)(1). The Court has *731 considered this cause on the Appellant’s motion and concludes the motion should be granted and the appeal should be dismissed. We therefore dismiss the appeal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
179 S.W.3d 730, 2005 Tex. App. LEXIS 9463, 2005 WL 3019013, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/je-boyd-general-contractor-inc-v-prestidge-smith-razloznik-inc-texapp-2005.