J.E. BLEY OVERSEAS TRADE OF SOUTH FLORIDA, INC., etc. v. IMMOKALEE REAL ESTATE HOLDINGS, LLC, etc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 16, 2022·No. 21-0462·Published

Opinion

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Opinion filed February 16, 2022. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D21-0462 Lower Tribunal Nos. 17-26820, 20-4426 ________________

J.E. Bley Overseas Trade of South Florida, Inc., etc., et al., Appellants,

vs.

Immokalee Real Estate Holdings, LLC, etc., Appellee.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, David C. Miller, Judge.

BLU Ocean Law Group, P.A., and Nashid Sabir; David J. Winker, P.A., and David J. Winker, for appellants.

Douglas H. Stein, P.A., and Douglas H. Stein, for appellee.

Before FERNANDEZ, C.J., and GORDO and BOKOR, JJ.

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. St. Petersburg Bank & Tr. Co. v. Hamm, 414 So. 2d 1071,

1073 (Fla. 1982) (outlining specific methodology for computing interest

pursuant to section 687.03(3), Florida Statutes); Rebman v. Flagship First

Nat’l Bank of Highlands Cty., 472 So. 2d 1360, 1363 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985)

(finding that escrow account used as interest reserve was properly

excluded from usury calculation).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

J.E. BLEY OVERSEAS TRADE OF SOUTH FLORIDA, INC., etc. v. IMMOKALEE REAL ESTATE HOLDINGS, LLC, etc., (Fla. Ct. App. 2022).

J.E. BLEY OVERSEAS TRADE OF SOUTH FLORIDA, INC., etc. v. IMMOKALEE REAL ESTATE HOLDINGS, LLC, etc. (J.E. BLEY OVERSEAS TRADE OF SOUTH FLORIDA, INC., etc. v. IMMOKALEE REAL ESTATE HOLDINGS, LLC, etc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

St. Petersburg Bank & Trust Co. v. Hamm
414 So. 2d 1071 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1982)
Rebman v. FLAGSHIP FIRST NAT. BANK
472 So. 2d 1360 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)