J.D. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

J.D. v. State

246 So. 3d 569

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJune 20, 2018

DocketNo. 3D17–2359

StatusPublished

This text of 246 So. 3d 569 (J.D. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

J.D. v. State, 246 So. 3d 569 (Fla. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Beasley v. State, 774 So.2d 649, 657 (Fla. 2000) (observing: "In moving for a judgment of acquittal, a defendant 'admits not only the facts stated in the evidence adduced, but also admits every conclusion favorable to the adverse party that a jury might fairly and reasonably infer from the evidence' ") (quoting Lynch v. State, 293 So.2d 44, 45 (Fla. 1974) ); State v. Rodriguez, 71 So.3d 154 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011) (observing that when a defendant moves for a judgment of acquittal based upon insufficiency of the evidence, all reasonable inferences and conclusions that may be drawn from the evidence must be viewed in the light most favorable to the State).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Beasley v. State, 774 So.2d 649, 657 (Fla. 2000) (observing: "In moving for a judgment of acquittal, a defendant 'admits not only the facts stated in the evidence adduced, but also admits every conclusion favorable to the adverse party that a jury might fairly and reasonably infer from the evidence' ") (quoting Lynch v. State, 293 So.2d 44, 45 (Fla. 1974) ); State v. Rodriguez, 71 So.3d 154 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011) (observing that when a defendant moves for a judgment of acquittal based upon insufficiency of the evidence, all reasonable inferences and conclusions that may be drawn from the evidence must be viewed in the light most favorable to the State).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

246 So. 3d 569, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jd-v-state-fladistctapp-2018.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack