J.D. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

J.D. v. State

807 So. 2d 818, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 2047, 2002 WL 269339

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 27, 2002

DocketNo. 4D01-1105

StatusPublished

This text of 807 So. 2d 818 (J.D. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

J.D. v. State, 807 So. 2d 818, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 2047, 2002 WL 269339 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

J.D. pled no contest to possession of a controlled substance (count I) and obstructing an officer with violence (count II), after his motion to suppress a controlled substance was denied. The state stipulated that the denial of the motion to suppress was dispositive as to count I. The trial court withheld an adjudication of de[819]*819linquency, placed J.D. on probation and ordered him to complete 100 hours of community service work.

J.D. appeals from the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress as to count I and asserts ineffective assistance of counsel as to count II. We affirm the delinquency disposition order without prejudice to raise the ineffective assistance of counsel claim under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850.

AFFIRMED.

POLEN, C.J., HAZOURI and MAY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

J.D. pled no contest to possession of a controlled substance (count I) and obstructing an officer with violence (count II), after his motion to suppress a controlled substance was denied. The state stipulated that the denial of the motion to suppress was dispositive as to count I. The trial court withheld an adjudication of de[819]*819linquency, placed J.D. on probation and ordered him to complete 100 hours of community service work.

J.D. appeals from the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress as to count I and asserts ineffective assistance of counsel as to count II. We affirm the delinquency disposition order without prejudice to raise the ineffective assistance of counsel claim under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850.

AFFIRMED.

POLEN, C.J., HAZOURI and MAY, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

807 So. 2d 818, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 2047, 2002 WL 269339, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jd-v-state-fladistctapp-2002.