Jd v. Dept., of Children & Families
This text of 825 So. 2d 447 (Jd v. Dept., of Children & Families) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
J.D., The Father of F.H., I.H., K.H., and V.H., Appellant,
v.
The DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Connie Renee Clay, Jacksonville, for Appellant.
Debora Elizabeth Fridie, Assistant General Counsel, Department of Children and Families, Jacksonville, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
In this appeal from a final order terminating his parental rights, appellant argues that reversal is required because appellee failed to establish by clear and convincing evidence all of the required elements. Appellant failed to preserve this issue for review by a motion for judgment of dismissal at the conclusion of appellee's case, see Fla. R. Juv. P. 8.525(h), or otherwise. Accordingly, we are constrained to affirm.
AFFIRMED.
BARFIELD and WEBSTER, JJ., concur.
BENTON, J., dissents.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
825 So. 2d 447, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jd-v-dept-of-children-families-fladistctapp-2002.