J.C. v. Department of Children & Family Services

136 So. 3d 621, 2013 WL 5226624, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 14838
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in J.C. v. Department of Children & Family Services. Read the opinion of the Court — 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 1089
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 18, 2013·No. No. 2D13-2079·Published

Opinion

SLEET, Judge.

J.C., the mother of G.C., appeals the trial court’s order on permanency review and notice of next hearing, which denied the Guardian ad Litem’s motion for reunification, placed G.C. in a permanent guardianship, and terminated supervision by the Department of Children and Family Services.1 The Department correctly concedes error because the case plan improperly requires the mother to admit to having caused harm to the minor child before reunification can take place in contravention to section 39.6011(1), Florida Statutes (2012).

We also agree with the Department s concession of error that the trial court’s order was not supported by competent, substantial evidence. See C.A. v. Dep’t of Children & Families, 988 So.2d 1247, 1248-49 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008) (“[Placement of a child in a permanent guardianship requires a finding by the trial court that reunification ... is not in the best interests of the child, and that finding must be supported by competent substantial evidence.”) Accordingly, we reverse the trial court’s order and remand for further proceedings.

Reversed and remanded.

KHOUZAM and CRENSHAW, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

J.C. v. Department of Children & Family Services, 136 So. 3d 621, 2013 WL 5226624, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 14838 (Fla. Ct. App. 2013).

136 So. 3d 621 (J.C. v. Department of Children & Family Services) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

CA v. Department of Children and Families
988 So. 2d 1247 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2008)