J.C. Eaglesmith v. Jack Ward, Mendocino County Superintendent of Schools

Ninth Circuit

J.C. Eaglesmith v. Jack Ward, Mendocino County Superintendent of Schools

70 F.3d 119, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 37861, 1995 WL 653865

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in J.C. Eaglesmith v. Jack Ward, Mendocino County Superintendent of Schools. Read the opinion of the Court — 73 F.3d 857 →

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided November 6, 1995·No. 94-15419·Unpublished

Opinion

70 F.3d 119w

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
J.C. EAGLESMITH, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Jack WARD, Mendocino County Superintendent of Schools,
Defendant-Appellee.

No. 94-15419.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted Aug. 14, 1995.
Decided Nov. 6, 1995.

NOTE: THE COURT HAS WITHDRAWN THIS OPINION

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

70 F.3d 119w

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
J.C. EAGLESMITH, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Jack WARD, Mendocino County Superintendent of Schools,
Defendant-Appellee.

No. 94-15419.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted Aug. 14, 1995.
Decided Nov. 6, 1995.

NOTE: THE COURT HAS WITHDRAWN THIS OPINION

J.C. Eaglesmith v. Jack Ward, Mendocino County Superintendent of Schools, 70 F.3d 119, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 37861, 1995 WL 653865 (9th Cir. 1995).

Pincite

70 F.3d 119 (J.C. Eaglesmith v. Jack Ward, Mendocino County Superintendent of Schools) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.