J.B. Williams, Jr. v. Shirley S. Chater, Commissioner of Social Security

Eighth Circuit

J.B. Williams, Jr. v. Shirley S. Chater, Commissioner of Social Security

53 F.3d 336, 1995 WL 253175

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

DecidedMay 2, 1995

Docket94-3340

StatusPublished

This text of 53 F.3d 336 (J.B. Williams, Jr. v. Shirley S. Chater, Commissioner of Social Security) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

J.B. Williams, Jr. v. Shirley S. Chater, Commissioner of Social Security, 53 F.3d 336, 1995 WL 253175 (8th Cir. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

53 F.3d 336
NOTICE: Eighth Circuit Rule 28A(k) governs citation of unpublished opinions and provides that no party may cite an opinion not intended for publication unless the cases are related by identity between the parties or the causes of action.

J.B. WILLIAMS, Jr., Appellant,
v.
Shirley S. CHATER, Commissioner of Social Security, Appellee.

No. 94-3340EA.

United States Court of Appeals,
Eighth Circuit.

Submitted: Apr. 26, 1995.
Filed: May 2, 1995.

Before FAGG, MAGILL, and BEAM, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

J.B. Williams, Jr. applied for disability insurance benefits alleging disability because of a gunshot wound to his groin in 1989. After a hearing, an Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) denied benefits, and the district court upheld the decision.

On appeal, Williams argues the ALJ wrongly concluded he did not suffer from a severe impairment, see 20 C.F.R. Sec. 404.1520(c) (impairment must significantly limit ability to do basic work activities), and improperly discredited his subjective complaints of pain. We disagree. The ALJ correctly determined Williams produced no credible evidence that his impairment restricted the basic work activities listed in 20 C.F.R. Sec. 404.1521(b). The medical evidence showed Williams had received no treatment for his groin injury since his routine postoperative care in 1989. Although the ALJ may not reject subjective complaints of disabling pain solely because of a lack of medical evidence, the absence of medical evidence is a factor the ALJ may consider. See Beeler v. Bowen, 833 F.2d 124, 126-27 (8th Cir. 1987). Having carefully reviewed the record, we conclude the ALJ properly applied the factors set forth in Polaski v. Heckler, 739 F.2d 1320, 1322 (8th Cir. 1984), to discredit Williams's subjective complaints.

We also reject Williams's argument that the ALJ did not fulfill his duty to develop the record fully and fairly. See Bishop v. Sullivan, 900 F.2d 1259, 1262 (8th Cir. 1990). We conclude the ALJ's decision is supported by substantial evidence on the record as a whole. See Nelson v. Sullivan, 966 F.2d 363, 366 (8th Cir. 1992).

Accordingly, we affirm.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

53 F.3d 336
NOTICE: Eighth Circuit Rule 28A(k) governs citation of unpublished opinions and provides that no party may cite an opinion not intended for publication unless the cases are related by identity between the parties or the causes of action.

J.B. WILLIAMS, Jr., Appellant,
v.
Shirley S. CHATER, Commissioner of Social Security, Appellee.

No. 94-3340EA.

United States Court of Appeals,
Eighth Circuit.

Submitted: Apr. 26, 1995.
Filed: May 2, 1995.

Before FAGG, MAGILL, and BEAM, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

J.B. Williams, Jr. applied for disability insurance benefits alleging disability because of a gunshot wound to his groin in 1989. After a hearing, an Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) denied benefits, and the district court upheld the decision.

On appeal, Williams argues the ALJ wrongly concluded he did not suffer from a severe impairment, see 20 C.F.R. Sec. 404.1520(c) (impairment must significantly limit ability to do basic work activities), and improperly discredited his subjective complaints of pain. We disagree. The ALJ correctly determined Williams produced no credible evidence that his impairment restricted the basic work activities listed in 20 C.F.R. Sec. 404.1521(b). The medical evidence showed Williams had received no treatment for his groin injury since his routine postoperative care in 1989. Although the ALJ may not reject subjective complaints of disabling pain solely because of a lack of medical evidence, the absence of medical evidence is a factor the ALJ may consider. See Beeler v. Bowen, 833 F.2d 124, 126-27 (8th Cir. 1987). Having carefully reviewed the record, we conclude the ALJ properly applied the factors set forth in Polaski v. Heckler, 739 F.2d 1320, 1322 (8th Cir. 1984), to discredit Williams's subjective complaints.

We also reject Williams's argument that the ALJ did not fulfill his duty to develop the record fully and fairly. See Bishop v. Sullivan, 900 F.2d 1259, 1262 (8th Cir. 1990). We conclude the ALJ's decision is supported by substantial evidence on the record as a whole. See Nelson v. Sullivan, 966 F.2d 363, 366 (8th Cir. 1992).

Accordingly, we affirm.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

53 F.3d 336, 1995 WL 253175, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jb-williams-jr-v-shirley-s-chater-commissioner-of--ca8-1995.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack