J.B. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

J.B. v. State

647 So. 2d 849, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 4137, 1994 WL 162795

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 3, 1994

DocketNo. 94-669

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 647 So. 2d 849 (J.B. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

J.B. v. State, 647 So. 2d 849, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 4137, 1994 WL 162795 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

CONFESSION OF ERROR

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, J.B., was represented by counsel when he entered a plea of nolo contende-re to charges of trespass and petit theft. However, at the disposition hearing, appellant waived his right to counsel prior to being adjudicated delinquent.

During a brief colloquy the court offered appellant a lawyer free of charge and informed him of the difficulties of appealing from any judgment or sentence. However, appellant was not advised of the disadvantages of self-representation and the possible sentencing dispositions which spanned from a withhold of adjudication to secure detention.

Appellant asserts that the trial court failed to advise him of the disadvantages of self-representation before accepting his waiver of counsel at the disposition hearing and the possible disposition alternatives the court could impose including the fact that he could be adjudicated delinquent and placed in secure detention. Moore v. State, 615 So.2d 874 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993); Taylor v. State, 610 So.2d 576 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992); Smith v. State, 549 So.2d 1147 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989); see also K.M. v. State, 448 So.2d 1124, 1125 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984). Failure to conduct a proper inquiry is not subject to harmless error analysis. State v. Young, 626 So.2d 655, 657 (Fla.1993).

Based upon the State’s proper confession of error, we reverse and remand for a new disposition hearing. Upon remand, appellant can waive counsel upon knowledge of the disadvantages of self-representation and the possible dispositions or procéed with appointed counsel. Accordingly, it is unnecessary to address the other issues raised by appellant.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

CONFESSION OF ERROR

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, J.B., was represented by counsel when he entered a plea of nolo contende-re to charges of trespass and petit theft. However, at the disposition hearing, appellant waived his right to counsel prior to being adjudicated delinquent.

During a brief colloquy the court offered appellant a lawyer free of charge and informed him of the difficulties of appealing from any judgment or sentence. However, appellant was not advised of the disadvantages of self-representation and the possible sentencing dispositions which spanned from a withhold of adjudication to secure detention.

Appellant asserts that the trial court failed to advise him of the disadvantages of self-representation before accepting his waiver of counsel at the disposition hearing and the possible disposition alternatives the court could impose including the fact that he could be adjudicated delinquent and placed in secure detention. Moore v. State, 615 So.2d 874 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993); Taylor v. State, 610 So.2d 576 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992); Smith v. State, 549 So.2d 1147 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989); see also K.M. v. State, 448 So.2d 1124, 1125 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984). Failure to conduct a proper inquiry is not subject to harmless error analysis. State v. Young, 626 So.2d 655, 657 (Fla.1993).

Based upon the State’s proper confession of error, we reverse and remand for a new disposition hearing. Upon remand, appellant can waive counsel upon knowledge of the disadvantages of self-representation and the possible dispositions or procéed with appointed counsel. Accordingly, it is unnecessary to address the other issues raised by appellant.

Reversed and remanded.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

647 So. 2d 849, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 4137, 1994 WL 162795, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jb-v-state-fladistctapp-1994.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack