J.B., THE FATHER v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 9, 2022
Docket21-2044
StatusPublished

This text of J.B., THE FATHER v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES (J.B., THE FATHER v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
J.B., THE FATHER v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, (Fla. Ct. App. 2022).

Opinion

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Opinion filed February 9, 2022. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D21-2044 Lower Tribunal No. 05-15686 ________________

J.B., The Father, Appellant,

vs.

Department of Children and Families, et al., Appellees.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Angelica D. Zayas, Judge.

Thomas Butler, P.A., and Thomas J. Butler, for appellant.

Karla Perkins, for appellee Department of Children and Families; Sara E. Goldfarb, Statewide Director of Appeals, and Laura J. Lee, Assistant Director of Appeals (Tallahassee); KCB Law, PLLC, and Khairiya C. Bryant (Orlando), for appellee Guardian ad Litem.

Before LOGUE, SCALES and GORDO, JJ.

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Fla. Dep’t of Child. & Families v. A.R., 253 So. 3d 1158,

1164 (Fla. 3d DCA 2018) (“Appellate review of a termination of parental

rights case is ‘highly deferential. . . . a finding that evidence is clear and

convincing enjoys a presumption of correctness and will not be overturned

on appeal unless clearly erroneous or lacking in evidentiary support.’”

(quoting C.G. v. Dep’t of Child. & Families, 67 So. 3d 1141, 1143 (Fla. 3d

DCA 2011))); J.E. v. Dep’t of Child. & Families, 126 So. 3d 424, 427 (Fla. 4th

DCA 2013) (“While a trial court’s decision to terminate parental rights must

be based on clear and convincing evidence, our review is limited to whether

competent substantial evidence supports the trial court’s judgment.”); T.J. v.

E.W.R., 721 So. 2d 723, 725 (Fla. 1998) (holding that incarceration may be

a factor, when considered with other factors in evidence, when determining

whether to terminate parental rights on the ground of abandonment).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

CG v. Department of Children and Families
67 So. 3d 1141 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)
Florida Dept. of Children & Families, et.al. v. A.R. and R.L., Parents
253 So. 3d 1158 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2018)
J.E. v. Department of Children & Families
126 So. 3d 424 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2013)
W.T.J. v. E.W.R.
721 So. 2d 723 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
J.B., THE FATHER v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jb-the-father-v-department-of-children-and-families-fladistctapp-2022.