J.B. Stauffer Construction Co. v. Mailloux

35 A.D.3d 1207, 825 N.Y.S.2d 407
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 22, 2006·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Onondaga County (Thomas J. Murphy, J), entered October 31, 2005 in a breach of contract action. The order, insofar as appealed from, denied that part of plaintiffs cross motion for leave to amend the complaint to add a cause of action for an account stated.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: Supreme Court did not abuse its discretion in denying that part of plaintiff’s cross motion seeking leave to amend the complaint to add a cause of action for an account stated, particularly in view of plaintiffs failure to present a satisfactory excuse for the delay in asserting that proposed cause of action and the prejudice to defendant if the court granted that part of the cross motion (see Thibeault v Palma, 266 AD2d 616, 617 [1999]). Present—Scudder, P.J., Martoche, Centra and Green, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

J.B. Stauffer Construction Co. v. Mailloux, 35 A.D.3d 1207, 825 N.Y.S.2d 407 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2006).

35 A.D.3d 1207 (J.B. Stauffer Construction Co. v. Mailloux) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Burke, Albright, Harter & Rzepka LLP v. Sills
2020 NY Slip Op 05322 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2020)