JB & RE WALKER, INC. v. Thayn

Utah Supreme Court

JB & RE WALKER, INC. v. Thayn

405 P.2d 342, 17 Utah 2d 120

CourtUtah Supreme Court

DecidedSeptember 9, 1965

Docket10224

StatusPublished

This text of 405 P.2d 342 (JB & RE WALKER, INC. v. Thayn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Utah Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

JB & RE WALKER, INC. v. Thayn, 405 P.2d 342, 17 Utah 2d 120 (Utah 1965).

Pincite

Opinion

17 Utah 2d 120 (1965) 405 P.2d 342

J.B. & R.E. WALKER, INC., A UTAH CORPORATION, AND J.B. WALKER AND GUDVOR W. BRABY, DBA WALKER SAND & GRAVEL COMPANY, A PARTNERSHIP, PLAINTIFFS AND RESPONDENTS,
v.
J. KENNETH THAYN, DBA THAYN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, DEFENDANT AND APPELLANT.

No. 10224.

Supreme Court of Utah.

September 9, 1965.

Clarence J. Frost, Salt Lake City, for appellant.

H. Arnold Rich and Leonard W. Elton, Salt Lake City, for respondents.

PER CURIAM.

The complaint of the plaintiffs contains eight causes of action all relating to and arising out of or because of a certain lease agreement with the defendant.

In the first cause of action, plaintiffs sought to have the lease declared terminated because of certain alleged breaches of its terms by the defendant. The remaining seven causes of action seek rentals and damages claimed to be due because of the alleged breaches.

A hearing was held and evidence received with respect to the first cause. This was over defendant's objection. At the conclusion thereof, the court entered a written judgment declaring the lease "to be terminated, cancelled and annulled by reason of the breaches * * * by the defendant." The judgment further recited: "That all other issues, matters and things pertaining to the second, third, fourth, fifth, sixth, seventh and eighth causes of action shall be and the same are hereby reserved for future determination by the court, and that the court retains jurisdiction of said cause for the purpose of determination of said matter and things."

It is from the foregoing judgment that defendant appeals. Although treated as such by both parties, this is not a final judgment from which an appeal may be taken.^[1] The instant case might well have been entertained as an appeal from an interlocutory order or decision.^[2] However, defendant did not see fit to follow that procedure.

A case cannot be brought to this court in fragments, and this appeal, not being from a final judgment, must be dismissed.^[3]

No costs awarded.

NOTES

[1] Rule 72(a), U.R.C.P.

[2] Rule 72(b), U.R.C.P.

[3] Attorney General of Utah v. Pomeroy, 93 Utah 426, 73 P.2d 1277, 114 A.L.R. 726 (1937).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

17 Utah 2d 120 (1965) 405 P.2d 342

J.B. & R.E. WALKER, INC., A UTAH CORPORATION, AND J.B. WALKER AND GUDVOR W. BRABY, DBA WALKER SAND & GRAVEL COMPANY, A PARTNERSHIP, PLAINTIFFS AND RESPONDENTS,
v.
J. KENNETH THAYN, DBA THAYN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, DEFENDANT AND APPELLANT.

No. 10224.

Supreme Court of Utah.

September 9, 1965.

Clarence J. Frost, Salt Lake City, for appellant.

H. Arnold Rich and Leonard W. Elton, Salt Lake City, for respondents.

PER CURIAM.

The complaint of the plaintiffs contains eight causes of action all relating to and arising out of or because of a certain lease agreement with the defendant.

In the first cause of action, plaintiffs sought to have the lease declared terminated because of certain alleged breaches of its terms by the defendant. The remaining seven causes of action seek rentals and damages claimed to be due because of the alleged breaches.

A hearing was held and evidence received with respect to the first cause. This was over defendant's objection. At the conclusion thereof, the court entered a written judgment declaring the lease "to be terminated, cancelled and annulled by reason of the breaches * * * by the defendant." The judgment further recited: "That all other issues, matters and things pertaining to the second, third, fourth, fifth, sixth, seventh and eighth causes of action shall be and the same are hereby reserved for future determination by the court, and that the court retains jurisdiction of said cause for the purpose of determination of said matter and things."

It is from the foregoing judgment that defendant appeals. Although treated as such by both parties, this is not a final judgment from which an appeal may be taken.^[1] The instant case might well have been entertained as an appeal from an interlocutory order or decision.^[2] However, defendant did not see fit to follow that procedure.

A case cannot be brought to this court in fragments, and this appeal, not being from a final judgment, must be dismissed.^[3]

No costs awarded.

NOTES

[1] Rule 72(a), U.R.C.P.

[2] Rule 72(b), U.R.C.P.

[3] Attorney General of Utah v. Pomeroy, 93 Utah 426, 73 P.2d 1277, 114 A.L.R. 726 (1937).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

405 P.2d 342, 17 Utah 2d 120, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jb-re-walker-inc-v-thayn-utah-1965.

Opinion

J.B. & R.E. WALKER, INC., A UTAH CORPORATION, AND J.B. WALKER AND GUDVOR W. BRABY, DBA WALKER SAND & GRAVEL COMPANY, A PARTNERSHIP, PLAINTIFFS AND RESPONDENTS, v. J. KENNETH THAYN, DBA THAYN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, DEFENDANT AND APPELLANT.

H. Arnold Rich and Leonard W. Elton, Salt Lake City, for respondents.

NOTES

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

J.B. & R.E. WALKER, INC., A UTAH CORPORATION, AND J.B. WALKER AND GUDVOR W. BRABY, DBA WALKER SAND & GRAVEL COMPANY, A PARTNERSHIP, PLAINTIFFS AND RESPONDENTS,
v.
J. KENNETH THAYN, DBA THAYN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, DEFENDANT AND APPELLANT.