J.B. Muros Corp. v. International Mall, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

J.B. Muros Corp. v. International Mall, Inc.

534 So. 2d 818, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2597, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 5242, 1988 WL 125620

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedNovember 29, 1988

DocketNo. 88-901

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 534 So. 2d 818 (J.B. Muros Corp. v. International Mall, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

J.B. Muros Corp. v. International Mall, Inc., 534 So. 2d 818, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2597, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 5242, 1988 WL 125620 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant seeks review of an order dismissing its complaint with prejudice, striking its answer to appellee’s counterclaim, and entering a judgment in favor of the appellee. Subsequent to this litigation being set for a non-jury trial, counsel for appellant J.B. Muros Corporation failed to appear at this case’s call of the calendar. Under such circumstances, it may be appropriate for a trial judge to impose sanctions against an attorney, but we must conclude that the ultimate sanction of dismissing a party’s complaint is too severe unless it is apparent from the record that indeed the client was in defiance of the court’s authority. Travelers Ins. Co. v. Rodriguez, 357 So.2d 464 (Fla. 2d DCA 1978); Masons Concrete of Crystal River, Inc. v. Corbin Well Pump & Supply, Inc., 364 So.2d 824 (Fla. 2d DCA 1978), cert. denied, 373 So.2d 457 (Fla.1979); First Republic Corp. v. Hayes, 431 So.2d 624 (Fla. 3d DCA), review denied, 441 So.2d 632 (Fla.1983).

The order of dismissal is reversed with directions to reinstate the complaint and answer to the defendant’s counterclaim.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant seeks review of an order dismissing its complaint with prejudice, striking its answer to appellee’s counterclaim, and entering a judgment in favor of the appellee. Subsequent to this litigation being set for a non-jury trial, counsel for appellant J.B. Muros Corporation failed to appear at this case’s call of the calendar. Under such circumstances, it may be appropriate for a trial judge to impose sanctions against an attorney, but we must conclude that the ultimate sanction of dismissing a party’s complaint is too severe unless it is apparent from the record that indeed the client was in defiance of the court’s authority. Travelers Ins. Co. v. Rodriguez, 357 So.2d 464 (Fla. 2d DCA 1978); Masons Concrete of Crystal River, Inc. v. Corbin Well Pump & Supply, Inc., 364 So.2d 824 (Fla. 2d DCA 1978), cert. denied, 373 So.2d 457 (Fla.1979); First Republic Corp. v. Hayes, 431 So.2d 624 (Fla. 3d DCA), review denied, 441 So.2d 632 (Fla.1983).

The order of dismissal is reversed with directions to reinstate the complaint and answer to the defendant’s counterclaim.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

534 So. 2d 818, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2597, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 5242, 1988 WL 125620, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jb-muros-corp-v-international-mall-inc-fladistctapp-1988.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack