Jaywyn Video Productions, Ltd. v. Showtime Networks, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Jaywyn Video Productions, Ltd. v. Showtime Networks, Inc.

210 A.D.2d 122, 621 N.Y.S.2d 846, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12723

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 15, 1994

StatusPublished

This text of 210 A.D.2d 122 (Jaywyn Video Productions, Ltd. v. Showtime Networks, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jaywyn Video Productions, Ltd. v. Showtime Networks, Inc., 210 A.D.2d 122, 621 N.Y.S.2d 846, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12723 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Bruce Wright, J.), entered May 25, 1994, which denied plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment and granted defendant’s cross-motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, and judgment of said court and Justice entered thereon on June 28, 1994, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Plaintiff’s complaint seeking damages arising from defendant’s payment of a $15,000 license fee to Ho-Tel, Inc., plaintiff’s alleged agent, despite plaintiff’s notification that it had commenced an action against Ho-Tel for, inter alia, violating the agency agreement, was properly dismissed. The complaint failed to state a cause of action. There is no basis for imposing liability on defendant for fulfilling its contractual obligation to Ho-Tel. Concur—Sullivan, J, P., Rosenberger, Wallach and Asch, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Bruce Wright, J.), entered May 25, 1994, which denied plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment and granted defendant’s cross-motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, and judgment of said court and Justice entered thereon on June 28, 1994, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Plaintiff’s complaint seeking damages arising from defendant’s payment of a $15,000 license fee to Ho-Tel, Inc., plaintiff’s alleged agent, despite plaintiff’s notification that it had commenced an action against Ho-Tel for, inter alia, violating the agency agreement, was properly dismissed. The complaint failed to state a cause of action. There is no basis for imposing liability on defendant for fulfilling its contractual obligation to Ho-Tel. Concur—Sullivan, J, P., Rosenberger, Wallach and Asch, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

210 A.D.2d 122, 621 N.Y.S.2d 846, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12723, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jaywyn-video-productions-ltd-v-showtime-networks-inc-nyappdiv-1994.