Jaynes v. Golden Crest Nursing Home
838 N.W.2d 576, 2013 WL 5872849, 2013 Minn. LEXIS 427
Opinion
ORDER
Based upon all the files, records, and proceedings herein,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers’ Compensation [577] Court of Appeals filed and served on March 13, 2013, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn.1982) (explaining that [s]ummary affirmances have no precedential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view, doing no more than establishing the law of the case).
BY THE COURT:
/s/_
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Jaynes v. Golden Crest Nursing Home, 838 N.W.2d 576, 2013 WL 5872849, 2013 Minn. LEXIS 427 (Mich. 2013).
838 N.W.2d 576 (Jaynes v. Golden Crest Nursing Home) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hoff v. Kempton
317 N.W.2d 361 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1982)